On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:00 07PM, Johan Brichau wrote: > > On 30 Aug 2010, at 15:35, jaayer wrote: > >> ---- On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:57:47 -0700 Levente Uzonyi wrote ---- >> >>> I don't like the "magical" #asString, but you should discuss it with >>> Andreas. Collection >> #ifEmpty: doesn't return nil, but the collection in >>> the WebClient-Pharo package (and in Squeak), and I think it's better than >>> nil. >> >> I opened a ticked on this a few weeks back: >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2794 >> >> The ifEmpty:/ifNotEmpty: behavior of Squeak is demonstrably better and >> should be adopted. > > heu... I evaluated the following in a pharo1.1-dev and 1.2-core: > > (#(foo) ifEmpty:[#bar]) -> returns #(foo) > (#() ifNotEmpty:[#bar]) -> returns #() > > This seems to do what you propose? > Johan > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Yes. Levente is right, I read the code of Andreas' wrong. Pharo 1.1/1.2 does this, so the override is for 1.0, where #ifEmpty: returns nil . Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
