On 02.09.2011 17:19, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 2 September 2011 17:27, Philippe Marschall <kus...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On 02.09.2011 15:39, Igor Stasenko wrote: >>> Looks like it tries to destroy socket which were left from previous session, >>> and of course fails because in newly started image the socket handle >>> invalid. >> >> Sure, but that should signal #primitiveFailed, not segfault the vm. >> > according to log, there is a primitive fail. > do you have a crash.dmp log?
No
