On 02/27/2012 01:56 PM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
... Results are interesting, Pharo is now only 3x slower than VW on dynamic page generation but on network layer it is the same or even slighty faster, ...
Do you have any explanation for this? I'm amazed at how close the number for static content are. Sure, it's the same Smalltalk code but different VMs. At least in the AJP case the image maxes out one core so I would expect the VM to play a big role. The numbers for dynamic content are more what I would expect.
Cheers Philippe
