2012/3/16 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>
> > how did you handle things like
> > 1/1/11 (or didn't you?)
> > or worse
> > 1/1/1 -> 01.01.2001?
> This is not related to parsing but to the interpretation of the data :)
>
> I agree with Stef, your seems to be more an interpretation problem. If you
are looking for a parser that can parse any kind of datas you can write
something like:
#digit asParser plus flatten separatedBy: ('/' asParser / '.' asParser)
But to know what you reading you should have some convention to follow.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
There is no magic no?
> BTW this is the birthday of one of my sons :)
>
> >
> > how have you treated dates like
> > 1/12/2012 -> 12.01.2012 or 1.12.2012?
> >
> > or even more "problematic"
> > 12/12/2012
>
> Again why a computer looking at only one sample would be prescient?
>
> > and the like there are so many way to parse the dates....
> >
> > Regards
> > Friedrich
> >
> > --
> > Q-Software Solutions GmbH; Sitz: Bruchsal; Registergericht: Mannheim
> > Registriernummer: HRB232138; Geschaeftsfuehrer: Friedrich Dominicus
> >
>
>
>
