Sven,
I looked at your sample document in the pdf:
TestDomainObject {
#created : DateAndTime [ '2012-02-14T16:40:15+01:00' ],
#modified : DateAndTime [ '2012-02-14T16:40:18+01:00' ],
#integer : 39581,
#float : 73.84789359463944,
#description : 'This is a test',
#color : #green,
#tags : [
#two,
#beta,
#medium
],
#bytes : ByteArray [ 'afabfdf61d030f43eb67960c0ae9f39f' ],
#boolean : false
}
And this is very readable (to me)... not as many '[]' as I inferred from
reading the tests:).
I take back my YAML comparison ... this has the nice flavor of Smalltalk ...
Dale
----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <s...@beta9.be>
| To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
| Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:06:22 AM
| Subject: [Pharo-project] STON (was Re: SimpleLiteralArray Spec)
|
| Norbert, Dale, et al,
|
|
| On 24 Apr 2012, at 18:43, Norbert Hartl wrote:
|
| > What is STON and STON-object syntax?
|
| Arhh, it is not yet finished, I did it for myself, not for trying to
| convince the world, since that it too hard anyway.
|
| This is the work-in-progress paper:
|
|
|
|
| The code lives here: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/STON
|
| It is a slight variation of JSON, adding some Smalltalk concepts, as
| well as a solution to the class problem.
|
| But again, I am not trying to convince anyone to use this, I did it
| as a proof of concept for myself, and I kind of like it.
|
| On the other hand, JSON is so ubiquitous that I wonder a bit, why
| bother ?
|
| Sven
|
|
| --
| Sven Van Caekenberghe
| http://stfx.eu
| Smalltalk is the Red Pill
|
|
|
|
|
