Well glad that now u put it this way! For me all that matter is jus knowing wat's gonna be up at the exam.
When I said someone who passed it realy wanned to know how to tackel the whole thing... u might fail once n pass the second time. I still dont get/understand the negative way of looking at my question. In all the cases thanks for your replies. Will never put such a question up here. On 4/26/05, Aaron Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris Ramsay wrote: > > Perhaps it came across as a bit cheeky to Aaron - I kind of got the > > impression that an answer from someone who has had a go but not passed > > the exam was not good enough for you... > > > > Really, I doubt whether there is any difference in doing the exam > > whatever the outcome, seeing as what you wanted to know was about > > taking the exam in the first place. > > That's exactly the impression I got too Chris. Glad I'm not the only > one to see it that way! I felt a bit inadequate there for a moment. :) > > Regardless, my advice still stands (if it still matters coming from a > "unsuccessful" exam taker) -- don't rush the exam and take your time. > Some of the questions are tricky in their wording. > > As an aside -- for those who are unsuccessful with the exam, don't > worry, it doesn't mean your a bad programmer. I've been programming PHP > for five years now, and there's very little I can't do with it. > > I just stink at exams; I get antsy when sitting for 30-60 minutes with > just a pencil and paper in a quiet room. > > -- > Aaron Gould > Programmer/Systems Administrator > PARTS CANADA > > "Proudly underperforming in exams for years..." > -- M.Saleh.E.G 97150-4779817
