Hi Tiffany, This could be quite interesting — indeed in “Salem”. Nothing to really view — I can do a “drive by”.
Could you check if there is any thing going on, like “pending”, etc.? 4898 Riverdale Rd S, Salem, OR Randy On May 9, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Rick Lyman <lyman.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Joe, > > Something like: > > Browser > Stream IN > miniPicoLisp (c to asm.js via emscripten) > PiL i/o > read-eval-print loop > Stream OUT > HTML, PiL i/o to Server, JSON, ... > localStorage, indexedDB, cookies, sessionStorage, ... > > Server > Stream IN > PicoLisp > PiL i/o from miniPicoLisp/Browser > read-eval-print loop > Stream OUT > PiL i/o to Browser/miniPicoLisp > > > http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#io: ...read-eval-print loop... > http://software-lab.de/doc/tut.html#funio: ...functions operate on implicit > input and output channels... > http://picolisp.com/wiki/?ideasPage: ...pilBrowserDB... > > > -rl > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rick, Christophe, > > I was thinking the same thing. miniPicolisp might be a simpler first step to > port > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rick Lyman <lyman.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Christophe, > > How about porting the c version using: https://github.com/kripken/emscripten? > > -rl > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Christophe Gragnic > <christophegrag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently embedding a «pedagogical pseudo-code like language» in PicoLisp. > As using plain browsers is a nice thing to have in front of students, > I tried with > EmuLisp (PicoLisp in JS, by Jon Kleiser, that I won't thank enough, with > Alex), > which proved to be a good solution for me. > > So I had some thoughts, ideas and questions. > > 1) EmuLisp lacks some functions. The first idea I had was to write them in the > available functions (like 'glue' with 'pack'). It worked for some, but > some others > needed to be implemented in JS. Now my question: how far could be pushed the > idea to write a maximal subset of Picolisp in a minimal subset of > Picolisp? Like in > the original paper of McCarthy or «the Jewel» in SICP? I'm not talking about > performance here, just functions availability. > > 2) Since PicoLisp64 is written in a «generic assembly» embedded in PicoLisp, > I was wondering (only wondering, since the concepts are a bit vague for me) if > instead of building the .s files we could build some http://asmjs.org/ > file(s). > > 3) Regarding EmuLisp again, and for your information, I've created > (and am using seriously!) a JS pil, that I named `piljs` which runs on node > > >
