Re: (< @X 18) doesn't behave as expected with pilog

[CILz]

Thanks for this Joe. However I will need to investigate as I don't know 
Picolisp enough yet. My purpose is first to translate Prolog queries to 
Pilog in a Prologish/Pilogish way.

Le 12/11/2016 à 16:23, Joe Bogner a écrit :
Untested, but what about using range/3 ?
http://software-lab.de/doc/refR.html#range/3

--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe