Thanks Alex, The feedback is appreciated. This is a good clarification of how namespaces work in the 64bit version.
Also, somehow, it had not 'clicked' with me that transient symbols could be used in this regard. Re-read that section of the documentation again... =) "With that mechanism, it is possible to create symbols with a local access scope, not accessible from other parts of the program" /Lindsay On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > Hi Lindsay, > > > Bijective Burrows Wheeler Transform > > https://github.com/thinknlive/picolisp-bbwt > > Cool! This code looks very good! :) > > > > As I was working on this I realized I need to start thinking about how to > > organize my code... > > > > The two main functions, encodeBBWT and decodeBBWT feel larger than they > > should be because I have defined smaller functions within them that use > > variables in the same scope. > > > > My question: Is there an 'idiomatic' or recommended way to organize > module > > or project code in picolisp? > > Binding the functions 'Put' and 'Bwt' locally is perfectly legal, but not > really > necessary here, as they never change. So they just create (minimal) runtime > overhead. I would define them the normal way, perhaps as transient symbols > if I > want to hide them from the outside world: > > (de "put" (B C) > (let (V ... > > (de "bwt" (W) > (let (C ... > > > Using a namespace is also possible, but too much overhead in my feeling > for such > a small file. It would go like this: > > (symbols 'bbwt 'pico) > (local put bwt) > > (de put (B C) # Shadows the built-in 'put', use with care > (let (V ... > > (de bwt (W) > (let (C ... > > (de pico~encodeBBWT (L) > ... > > (de pico~decodeBBWT (L) > ... > > This creates the symbol 'encodeBBWT' in the 'pico' namespace. Another (I > think > better) way is: > > (de encode (L) > ... > > (de decode (L) > ... > > and later, when used from another namespace, call it as > > (bbwt~encode ...) > (bbwt~decode ...) > > > Concerning 'Debug', I would omit it here, and call (trace 'encodeBBWT) or > (trace > 'bbwt~encode) or (mapc trace '(bbwt~encode bbwt~decode bbwt~put bbwt~bwt) > to > debug it. > > Other minor improvements: > > V2 (car (cdr V)) ) > -> > V2 (cadr V) ) > > > (while (car W) > (if (not (cdr W)) > (Put C (car W)) > (Put (car (cdr W)) (car W)) ) > -> > (while (car W) > (Put > (ifn (cdr W) C (cadr W)) > (car W) ) > > and some similar cases :) > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >