Thanks for the info, I had a look on it in the meantime. But: Even if
Viggo is a good photographer, as the shots are all printed with an Epson
Printer, that means that they are probably treated, (I imagine using
Paintshop Pro or Photoshop or something similar) and if only to resize
or something similar WHERE IS THE PROOVE that they are pinholes and not
just "mishandled".
Taco
Pinhole Blender wrote:
Taco,
Archival Pigment Prints is another name for pigment Inkjet such as Epsons
archival pigment printers. It has come about to differentiate from Geclee which
means sprayed on ink. The prints from the Epson 2200, 7600 or 9600 are
considered archival in that they should last at least 80 years.
I say Viggo Mortensen's work in a magazine called Juxtapose last month, I'll
have to go out and get Vanity Fair, I like his style.
Chris
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Return of the King's Aragorn a Pinholer!
From: "Wolfgang Thoma" <th...@pandora.be>
Date: Sat, December 27, 2003 6:44 am
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???????
Michael Heath wrote:
The current Vanity Fair issue has an interesting article on actor
Viggo Mortensen and his artistic pursuits, which include photography
http://www.robertmanngallery.com/artists/mortensen/thumbnail_01.html
Mike
Nice shots on this URL, but help needed: What is a "archival pigment
print"???
Taco
