You need to use a larger format enlarger with a masked neg holder to print them traditionally. I can only print my 35mm panorama shots up to my enlargers limit of a 6x7 carrier masked off. Finding a 4x5 or 8x10 enlarger would be key.
-----Original Message----- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???????] On Behalf Of Traci Bunkers Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:00 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Panorama printing question & static So, I did some pinhole photos using 2 cans and got some panoramic shots. The film was too long to put in my neg holder for my scanner. And that brought up a question. How would I even print this? It wouldn't fit into my heg holder for my enlarger.. . So it seems laying it on the scanner bed and scanning it is the only way I could? I had to put a scratched up piece of plexiglass on top of it to hold it flat. . . . Here are my pinholes: The first one is from a tea can (62mm focal length), the other 2 from a holiday can (87mm focal length) http://www.bonkersfiber.com/photos/pinhole/teacancemeteryselfportrait.jp g http://www.bonkersfiber.com/photos/pinhole/bluecancemeteryselfportrait.j pg http://www.bonkersfiber.com/photos/pinhole/bluecancemetery.jpg The first one (when enlarged) has a lot of dust and hair in it--this was not on the negative, but was part of the negative. So, I think the static must have made the debris cling to the film when I was loading it into my can. Does anyone else have this problem? What can you do about it? It wasn't as noticeable in the other 2. -- Traci Bunkers Bonkers Handmade Originals http://www.bonkersfiber.com _______________________________________________ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???????/discussion/
