On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 09:28:59PM -0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Sorry Ana, this should have gone to the list > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > >> koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have > >> the beta2 and using its packaging beta3 should be straightforward to build. > > > > Is there anything I can do to reverse this? I mean, perhaps it needs > > some test or something like that in order to upload it. Or maybe > > there's another reason not to upload it :-) > >
IIRC you have commit access, so improve/fix what you think that needs to be done and commit it. The problem is on my side, because I am not going to review, test and so on, you changes and then upload (nothing against you, just I can not do that currently). And I am not sure somebody else will volunteer. But whatever you do will be done for beta4 which i am planning to upload. BTW, beta4 will be released by the 10th of December, i will upload it to Debian, but do not expect it in the repos exaclty that day... Ana -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk