Jacek Konieczny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24-05-2006 20:33]:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:25:28PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
>> some of us use mutt 1.5.x for several months now and it works
>> very nice.
>> maybe it is time to put it on HEAD or maybe even in AC branch?
> +1 from me. 

+1, I'm using it without problems since

  $ perl -le 'print~~localtime `rpm -q --qf %{installtime} mutt`'
  Sat Aug  7 01:18:11 2004

AC-branch: I wouldn't mind, but there are minor differences in muttrc
syntax (eg. set alternates vs alternates, also something around pgp,
if I remember correctly).

-- 
Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgplg6IrwzBzY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to