Jacek Konieczny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24-05-2006 20:33]: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:25:28PM +0100, wrobell wrote: >> some of us use mutt 1.5.x for several months now and it works >> very nice. >> maybe it is time to put it on HEAD or maybe even in AC branch? > +1 from me.
+1, I'm using it without problems since $ perl -le 'print~~localtime `rpm -q --qf %{installtime} mutt`' Sat Aug 7 01:18:11 2004 AC-branch: I wouldn't mind, but there are minor differences in muttrc syntax (eg. set alternates vs alternates, also something around pgp, if I remember correctly). -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgplg6IrwzBzY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en