Please do not: %define skip_post_check_so ANYTHING
without a very good reason. The missing-symbols check has been enabled to detect broken linking and fix it, not to disable it anytime a problem appears. Right now there are 45 specs that define skip_post_check_so, only 11 of them have a comment why it's been disabled, and only 5 of them give a good reason to disable symbol checking. Good reasons are: - binary (no source) package, cannot be relinked - broken design - circular dependency between libraries - symbols provided by an executable If you happen to stumble upon any of the above, please add a descriptive comment just above %define skip_post_check_so. In any other case FIX LIBRARY LINKING ! Best regards, Przemysław Iskra. -- ____ sparky -- Przemyslaw ................ LANG...Pl,Ca,Es,En /____) ___ ___ _ _ || Iskra : WWW . http://ppcrcd.pld-linux.org/ \____\| -_)'___| ||^'||//\\// : WWW2 ............ http://rsget.pl/ (____/|| (_-_|_|| ||\\ || : eMail ..... <spa...@pld-linux.org> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en