> On Feb 10, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Elan Ruusamäe <g...@delfi.ee> wrote: > > On 13.01.2015 18:30, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: >> rpm -Va emits such messages: >> >> error: rpmdb (h#123): Header V4 DSA signature: BAD, key ID e4f1bc2d > so, what's our fix for pld? this regression is ugly! >
So disable header signature verification in lib/verify.c. The behavior is relatively new and has been disabled before. > if not going to fix this, at least put assert(1!=0) so end users won't be > confused like rpm db is corrupted, I can’t fix what I cannot reproduce. For starters, that is an RSA. not a DSA key, when looked up on key servers. > as if you are going to do rpm repair with that rpm 5.4.15, things will get > very worse. > So disable signature checking on retrieved headers using rpm -Va in lib/verify.c and be happy. 73 de Jeff > -- > glen > > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
