At Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:59:01 -0600, Doug Williams wrote: > Would it be better to call > the operations 'unchecked-<whatever>' instead of 'unsafe-<whatever>'? > Generally, we are calling the function because we know it is safe to avoid > some constraint check - not because it is unsafe. Just a nit.
Despite the distinction between unsafety for performance and unsafety to get at new things, I like having all unsafe operations marked the same way. Also, "unchecked" doesn't sound dangerous enough to me. So, you make a good point, but I'm still in favor of "unsafe". _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
