On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > Actually, I think these questions boil down to this: whether a > sequence of continued records should be treated as one big record, > or the intent for creation of this paradigm was to provide for > seamless *scrolling* on display?
I think they should be treated as one big record. I also think that we should add that to the format description, i.e. we should include a note that says something like "Only the first record in a sequence of continued records should include navigation metadata". Similar for the ExceptionalCharSets. Does anyone think this is a bad idea? If not, then I will add it to the Plucker format description. /Mike _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list plucker-dev@rubberchicken.org http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev