Larry K. Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you want to post this to the list that's ok by me. I got flamed by one = > of the developers because of the automatic signature my mail system adds to= > my email, so I don't post to the list anymore.
I think you are fixing a symptom, not the problem. These automatic footers (which are not signatures because they do not obey the normal conventions for signatures) often contain verbose clauses which have little legal effect. As you seem to have found, it does your company more harm than good in the damage to its reputation for running such an ill-behaved email system. Anyway, can anyone name one case where these legalese footers have prevented a company in your country being sued in court over email content? In the UK, there has been at least one case where they were successfully sued despite having one of these footers. Email me offlist, please. Sorry all for going OTT OT. MJR _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
