Joshua Zeidner wrote: > > > On 8/29/07, *keith smith* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in > compliance. > > > > And for my reference, WHO is PLUG?
Straight to the point. WE are PLUG. There is a Steering Committee with a chair person but, they direct the group in a "benevolent dictator" style, sort of... The committee does makes sure stuff happens but has no real force of control. There are no by-laws or hard rules for the committee to lean on or point at. PLUG members follow or don't or grumble or yell as they see fit. So, your point is taken. If anyone is reserving the right to ban someone, who has that right and what are the criteria? I don't know the answer to that question. Better yet, I don't want to need to know the answer to that question. In the history of PLUG that I know, no one has ever been banned. Ever. I'd much rather continue as it has all these years. Self policing works and this group is very good at it. I, for one, would not want the power to ban anyone. Alan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
