-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

not to mention being smart ass gloria whores.

sorry for the profanity.  just couldn't help it. came from deep
within.  :D


Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> At the risk of being cynical, the guys running the show at Comelec
> are just hopelessly stubborn and stone hearted when it comes to the
> source code review. Only lawsuits will stop them now.
>
> Sent from my Nokia phone -----Original Message----- From: jan
> gestre Sent:  2009-10-09 09:36:39 Subject:  Re: [plug] The Death of
> Election 2010 Source Code Review
>
> What's with this? <snip>
>
> US-BASED SysTest Labs was declared as the winning bidder that will
> certify the source code of the software to be installed in the
> 82,200 precinct count optical scan (PCOS) machines for the May 2010
> elections.
>
> Poll Commissioner Rene Sarmiento said that out of the four
> international companies that participated in the bidding last week,
> SystTest Labs was able to comply with all the requirements set by
> the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) of the Commission on Elections
> (Comelec).
>
> Taken from -->
> http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/us-firm-wins-bid-review-pcos-source-code
>  They're not allowing Cenpeg et al. but the awarded a bid to a US
> based firm? WTF.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Junn Flores <ergo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Pablo Manalastas wrote:
>>>> The Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG) is
>>>> making one LAST FINAL APPEAL to COMELEC to release the source
>>>> code of the election computer programs NOW, so that we can do
>>>> a source code review.
>>>>
>>>> If you believe in this CAUSE, please help CenPEG by
>>>> supporting this appeal. You can do so by replying to this
>>>> email, adding your name, position, etc to the end of the
>>>> list, and email this reply to
>>>>
>>>> "Evi Jimenez" <evime...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Ms.Evi Jimenez is a Director of CenPEG coordinating this
>>>> appeal. Thanks
>>>>
>>>> ~Pablo Manalastas~
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>> From: evi jimenez <evime...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Sep 30,
>>>> 2009 at 5:10 PM Subject: For Signing_Joint Appeal for release
>>>> of source code_Sept30 To: bobbyl...@hotmail.com, "Bro. Vince
>>>> Fernandez" <brvince...@yahoo.com>, bromannyhil...@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sept. 29, 2009
>>>>
>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>
>>>> After going around to share the findings of our study on the
>>>> AES, we now ask for your support.  Can you help follow up the
>>>> Comelec to release the source code for review, as mandated in
>>>> RA 9369 and which was approved en banc to be given to CenPEG
>>>> for independent review by its network of computer scientists
>>>> in the academe?
>>>>
>>>> The recent storm Ondoy last week hit us unprepared.  Many
>>>> lives were lost and billions of pesos worth of property
>>>> destroyed. THAT was a disaster of terrible magnitude that
>>>> could have been prevented, or at least mitigated through a
>>>> comprehensive disaster preparedness program. The coming
>>>> automated polls, the first to be implemented nationwide, will
>>>> need the same preparedness.
>>>>
>>>> Please support the cause for a credible and transparent
>>>> election by signing the following Statement. Emailing us back
>>>> with a short note to confirm your signature would be most
>>>> appreciated. You may also download the attached copy of the
>>>> Appeal and ask your friends especially those who attended our
>>>> briefings, to sign. We are rushing against time. There is
>>>> little time left for a meaningful source code review.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Evi
>>>>
>>>> Center for People Empowerment in Governance www.cenpeg.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A FOLLOW-UP APPEAL TO THE COMELEC
>>>>
>>>> COMPLY WITH THE AUTOMATED ELECTION SYSTEM LAW;
>>>>
>>>> RELEASE THE SOURCE CODE FOR REVIEW NOW!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> September 30, 2009
>>>>
>>>> The country has barely eight months to go before May 10, 2010
>>>> when 48 million Filipino voters are expected to troop to the
>>>> polls. On that day, the voters shade their votes on small
>>>> ovals opposite the names of their candidates on ballots 2.5
>>>> feet long, and feed the ballots into the Precinct Count
>>>> Optical Scan-Optical Mark Reader (PCOS-OMR) machines that
>>>> will read and count their votes, and transmit the vote
>>>> tallies at the end of voting day to the Consolidation and
>>>> Canvassing System (CCS) machines. If everything goes as
>>>> planned, the next President, Vice President, and other
>>>> national and local elective officials will be known in 2-3
>>>> days.
>>>>
>>>> For the speed that it promises, the Automated Election System
>>>> (AES) is certainly revolutionary, and the AES Law or RA 9369,
>>>> a landmark piece of legislation that could modernize the
>>>> fraud-ridden voting in the Philippines.  But speed without
>>>> addressing the deep-seated problem of cheating in the country
>>>> will make the automated election a wasteful exercise at
>>>> PhP7.2 billion. Machines can help, but will not solve fraud
>>>> completely.
>>>>
>>>> The voters must be assured that the machines themselves
>>>> cannot be used as instruments for cheating, that they have
>>>> been programmed correctly and are internally resistant to
>>>> vote rigging. For this, the RA 9369 provides for certain
>>>> safeguards that the Comelec is duty bound to implement. One
>>>> of the key safeguards is the source code review provision:
>>>>
>>>> Section 12 [Sec 14] of RA 9369 mandates, Once an AES
>>>> technology is selected for implementation, the Commission
>>>> shall promptly make the source code of that technology
>>>> available and open to any interested political party or
>>>> groups which may conduct their own review thereof."
>>>> [underscoring supplied]
>>>>
>>>> Source code is the human-readable set of computer program
>>>> instructions used to specify the internal actions to be
>>>> performed by the PCOS-OMR called SAES-1800 (Smartmatic
>>>> Auditable Election System) machines and CCS called REIS
>>>> (Real-Time Information System) computers. A most thorough
>>>> examination of the source code for correctness and security
>>>> of the programs running in the e-voting machines to be used
>>>> for the first time in the countrys election history must be
>>>> undertaken by reputable computer scientists who are known for
>>>> their independence and probity and are unattached to the
>>>> vendor or the Comelec.. This will ascertain that the programs
>>>> in the machines will correctly implement the provisions of RA
>>>> 9369 for counting, canvassing, and transmission of the votes
>>>> and that any serious security flaws are identified and
>>>> properly fixed. More than the external procedural features of
>>>> the machines  that is, feeding of the ballots into the
>>>> PCOS-OMR machines to printing of the Election Returns  the
>>>> correctness and the security of the internal programs running
>>>> in the machines should be of primordial concern.
>>>>
>>>> It was in this spirit of transparency that on May 26, 2009,
>>>> the Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG)
>>>> wrote the Comelec requesting for the source code of the
>>>> counting and canvassing computers as well as the election
>>>> database and servers. On June 10, the Comelec en banc
>>>> approved the release of the source code for review through
>>>> its Minute Resolution No. 09-0366 but it was delivered to
>>>> CenPEG only on July 10, the day of the contract signing
>>>> between the Comelec and Smartmatic-TIM.
>>>>
>>>> To this day, however, the Comelec has not yet released the
>>>> source code, citing as reasons the following: lack of
>>>> guidelines (Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez), premature
>>>> release (Comelec Executive Director Jose Tolentino, also
>>>> PMO), CenPEG (and other groups) to apply (first) as resource
>>>> person & and under controlled conditions, and the source
>>>> code does not currently exist (Atty. Ferdinand Rafanan of
>>>> the Comelec legal department), and we are still waiting for
>>>> Smartmatic-TIM to turn over the source code so that it could
>>>> be opened for review (Commissioner Rene Sarmiento who
>>>> pointed out that the source code is not owned by Smartmatic
>>>> but by another firm, Canadas Dominion Voting Systems!).
>>>>
>>>> Then on the September 21 poll automation forum on ANC TV,
>>>> Atty. Rafanan delivered a final blow to the call for source
>>>> code review by announcing that CenPEG (and other interested
>>>> groups) will not do a source code review, but that an
>>>> international certification agency will do it as a requisite
>>>> to TEC (Technical Evaluation Committee) certification. This
>>>> announcement is misleading. As clearly spelled out in RA
>>>> 9369, the certification by TEC through an international
>>>> entity is a separate requirement (Sec. 9) from the mandate to
>>>> release the source code for review by interested groups (Sec.
>>>> 12).
>>>>
>>>> We, concerned citizens and organizations from various
>>>> professions and sectors, join other interested groups like
>>>> CenPEG in demanding that the source code be made available to
>>>> interested groups as provided by law so that it may be
>>>> reviewed by competent computer experts who are not vendors or
>>>> Comelec-designated but are independent and known for their
>>>> probity and integrity in the IT hardware and software
>>>> security industry.
>>>>
>>>> Source code review, in accordance with international
>>>> standards, takes time. Any further delay in the release of
>>>> the source code for thorough examination by interested
>>>> groups will surely frustrate the intent of the law to give
>>>> all concerned the opportunity to review the source code and
>>>> be assured of the integrity of the e-voting system.
>>>>
>>>> We believe that implementing this particular safeguard, even
>>>> if not a sure-cure to fraud, is a big step toward ensuring
>>>> the integrity of the automated election system, that internal
>>>> safeguards are well plugged in while assuring the Filipino
>>>> voters that the machines are secured, accurate, and reliable.
>>>> Reviewing the source code will certainly not make the system
>>>> impervious to external attacks and manipulation but rather
>>>> make it more immune to manipulation as possible
>>>> vulnerabilities are identified and fixed beforehand. In
>>>> landmark cases in the U.S., more and more citizens groups
>>>> are calling for e-voting systems to be periodically reviewed
>>>> long before the elections to check if they are defective,
>>>> obsolete, or otherwise unacceptable.
>>>>
>>>> We reiterate in strongest terms our call for the Comelec to
>>>> comply with Sec. 12 of RA 9369 and release the source code of
>>>> the PCOS-OMR and CCS computer programs NOW before it is too
>>>> late..
>>>>
>>>> As we sign this joint statement, of primordial concern to us
>>>> are the rights of the voters and the integrity of the voting
>>>> system. While our demand for the release of the source code
>>>> is based on law, we believe that the review is critical on
>>>> moral, political and economic grounds. Let us work together
>>>> in making sure that the integrity of the machines and our
>>>> votes will not be under grave threats.
>>>>
>>>> Signed:
>>>>
>>>> Name                                             Organization
>>>>  Designation
>>>>
>>>> Alfredo E. Pascual                     University of the
>>>> Philippines                     President
>>>>
>>>> Alumni Association (UPAA)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bishop Broderick S. Pabillo       National Secretariat for
>>>> Chairman
>>>>
>>>> Social Action (NASSA)-
>>>>
>>>> Catholic Bishops Conference
>>>>
>>>> Of the Philippines (CBCP)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bishop Deogracias S. Iniguez    Public Affairs Committee
>>>> Chairman
>>>>
>>>> CBCP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Angelito S. Averia, Jr..                 Philippine Computer
>>>>
>>>> Emergency Response Team (PhCERT)    President
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> Salvador P. Flores Jr. Maynilad Water Services, Inc.
> Network Administrator
>
>
>>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFKzrPVP6yMxtoXFZYRAnHxAJ4+R6pGCrk+C5NQGG8yi0+LHdjmogCfVu7r
w/uUPSg9xC3Qtu6l2vBWdrQ=
=sYU2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to