On Fri, 13 May 2011, Michael C. Robinson wrote: > I prefer CentOS over SL if SL is not binary compatible with RHEL.
I very strongly suspect that SL's somewhat less stringent compatibility with RHEL would matter only for installations reliant on third-party binaries. Even then, it would probably only be an issue in a fraction of the cases. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/ _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
