Hi Paolo,
thanks a lot!
I get the correct length of octetDeltaCount now.
After taking a closer look at the template advertisements I think
there're still a few inconsistences (either in my collector or your
exporter :)
Here's an example with edited IP address:
Data Record (first 32B)
[0 50 182 16 0 50 96 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 229 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 0
0 0 0 0 192 168]
Template Field Specifiers
id: 21 length: 4
id: 1 length: 8
id: 60 length: 1 <-- ipVersion is 0 in Data Record
id: 14 length: 2 <-- egressInterface should be 4B
id: 8 length: 4 <-- sourceIPv4Address
id: 7 length: 2
id: 5 length: 1
id: 4 length: 1
id: 1025 length: 15
id: 22 length: 4
id: 2 length: 8
id: 10 length: 2 <-- ingressInterface should be 4B
id: 61 length: 1
id: 12 length: 4
id: 11 length: 2
What looks strange to me:
1) egressInterface and ingressInterface are 2B (should be 4B)
2) ipVersion is 0 in Data Record
2) sourceIPv4Address doesn't match the advertized offset
Can you point me to the LOC where the template is built?
I couldn't find it by glancing over the source.
Best,
Jake
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:08:34AM +0000, Paolo Lucente wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this. Issue should be fixed now in the
code in the CVS (tests good to me). Can you verify it seems
to work allright to you too?
Cheers,
Paolo
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, pmac...@online.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pmacct as an IPFIX-exporter.
It seems in the Template the octetDeltaCount is advertized as 32 bits
whereas the actual length in the Data Set is 64 bits.
According to RFC [1] the octetDeltaCount is 64 bits long.
Can anyone confirm the error (or even fix it)?
Best,
Jake
[1] RFC5102, 5.10.1
~
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
