On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:07:25PM -0500, The Editor wrote: > > The whole reason Pm has been holding off on developing a hierarchical > groups recipe is there is no way to make the same link both a group > and a name.
This isn't precisely true. The reason I've held off developing a hierarchical groups recipe is because the various methods we've tried thus far are either too confusing or too frustrating to adopt as part of the core. Finding a way to get a link point to both a group and a leaf page would be a solution, but it's not the only approach I'm willing to accept. > Maybe he thinks a solution will come one, but I'm not > sure there can be a solution to this problem. I'm not sure a solution is likely either, which is why there's a whole page (PmWiki.HierarchicalGroups) to explain why PmWiki doesn't have them. It's worth re-reading that page to see the reasons -- especially the first paragraphs of "Pm's Explanation" and "History". Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users