On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:00:43PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> [2010-07-20T16:40:18] > > > perlpodspec says that the former is an unordered list and the latter is a > > > description list. I think pod2html is wrong here. > > > > If so, my next question would be: how dependent are people on this? Is it > > something we want to consider adding to the spec? Or should pod2html be > > changed to remove this interpretation? > > I would like to see pod2html (as a Pod::Html-based thing) be replaced with > Pod::Simple, which should fix this. Noncompliant documents should be fixed.
I would love to see Pod::Html (and Pod::Checker) replaced with Pod::Simple based equivalents. But I don't have the time to do this. http://news.perlfoundation.org/2010/07/2010q3-call-for-grant-proposal.html might be useful for others, if time == money (or they can define an exchange rate between the two) Nicholas Clark
