Ok, thanks for suggestion. No select is taking place, unless I do it
manually and via sqlite client. The crash occurred in the middle of
the night, so my interference can be ruled out :D
Maybe I should move to a file based logging as this seems more robust.

Thank you all for your time.

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Rocco Caputo <rcap...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Every module seems to be re-initializing your logger.  I don't know if it's 
> harmful in your situation, but it's not recommended.  Wherever you call 
> Log::Log4perl::init($log_conf) try Log::Log4perl->init_once($log_conf) 
> instead.  See: 
> http://search.cpan.org/~mschilli/Log-Log4perl-1.38/lib/Log/Log4perl.pm#Initialize_once_and_only_once
>
> Offhand I don't see anything else that would lock your log database.  Maybe 
> another program is locking it in SELECT?  If that's true, the queries are 
> taking too long for the bot to wait.  Maybe you could optimize the table 
> indexes so the queries complete in time.
>
> --
> Rocco Caputo <rcap...@pobox.com>
>
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 07:04, Antti Linno wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your kind interest.
>>
>> The pastebins:
>>
>> log4perl.conf http://pastebin.com/nY4twgjS
>> main file http://pastebin.com/ruYsu2qt
>> application logic http://pastebin.com/hMyyBJ0U
>> database interaction http://pastebin.com/Cq7d4geK
>>
>> As you can see, all the perl files are logging, main and application
>> import database functions. I have snipped the application and database
>> somewhat, but you could see the main structure and how I am doing the
>> logging.
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Rocco Caputo <rcap...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 07:58, Antti Linno wrote:
>>>
>>>> First of all, I have to apologise. Still no pastebin.
>>>
>>> We have to apologize, too.  You're asking questions about code we cannot 
>>> see.  This impairs our ability to provide satisfying answers.
>>>
>>>> But a general tree would be something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Main POE module, imported submodule1, imported submodule2. All 3
>>>> modules open the same logger conf and use the same sqlite file to
>>>> append the log. Theoretically the log file could be locked, if all 3
>>>> or even 2 modules try to write at the same time.
>>>
>>> No.  As others have said, POE doesn't pre-empt.  Under ordinary 
>>> circumstances, we expect all three modules to call Log::Log4perl 
>>> sequentially rather than concurrently.  We don't expect Log::Log4perl 
>>> suffer from lock contention.
>>>
>>> It's very likely that something extraordinary is happening as a result of 
>>> code we cannot see.  Others have already outlined the most likely reasons 
>>> for the symptoms you described.  I hope you understand that's the best we 
>>> can do without your cooperation.
>>>
>>>> What would be the nice and tidy thing to do? Initialize logger in main
>>>> POE module and pass it to submodules?
>>>
>>> That's such a good question that Log::Log4perl already answers it:
>>>
>>> "Why Log::Log4perl->get_logger and not Log::Log4perl->new? We don't want to 
>>> create a new object every time. Usually in OO-Programming, you create an 
>>> object once and use the reference to it to call its methods. However, this 
>>> requires that you pass around the object to all functions and the last 
>>> thing we want is pollute each and every function/method we're using with a 
>>> handle to the Logger:
>>>
>>> [example omitted]
>>>
>>> "Instead, if a function/method wants a reference to the logger, it just 
>>> calls the Logger's static get_logger($category) method to obtain a 
>>> reference to the one and only possible logger object of a certain category. 
>>> That's called a singleton if you're a Gamma fan."
>>>
>>> That quote is from 
>>> http://search.cpan.org/~mschilli/Log-Log4perl-1.38/lib/Log/Log4perl.pm#Initialize_via_a_configuration_file
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rocco Caputo <rcap...@pobox.com>
>

Reply via email to