Infinitely small nanostructures will soon permeate your food,body 
&environment on the grounds of improving structure,preventing disease 
&enhancing traits,but their potential 2B toxic,invade immune systems or simply 
behave erratically &unexpectedly could pose real dangers in a burgeoning 
industry rapidly delving in2 the unknown 
  
  
The Unknown Dangers of Nanotech
  
Infinitely small nanostructures will soon permeate your food, body and 
environment on the grounds of improving structure, preventing disease and 
enhancing traits, but their potential to be toxic, invade immune systems or 
simply behave erratically and unexpectedly could pose real dangers in a 
burgeoning industry rapidly delving into the unknown 
   
  Aaron Dykes / Jones Report | December 6, 2007 
   
   
               
   
   
   
   
   
   
  Nanotechnology could become a revolutionary force in the near future, but its 
microparticulate nature poses uncertain risks and unknown dangers as it infuses 
unchecked with foods, cosmetics, medical treatments, plastics and many other 
materials which already permeate hundreds of consumer products.
   
   
  Many scientists have recently aired their concerns in an apparent paradox-- 
the very developments expected to work wonders across the gamut of science, 
medicine, technology and everyday life could expose consumers to the 
vulnerability of nanotech's infinitely small size and potential instability.
   
   
  The Economist reports that:
    "Nanoparticulate versions of a [known] material can act in novel ways... 
despite hundreds of years of experience in chemistry, it is not easy to predict 
how a substance will behave when it is made extremely small. Plenty of research 
suggests that nanoparticles of harmless substances can become exceptionally 
dangerous. Materials, such as gold, that would not react to other substances 
become reactive. [Yet] silver can have antimicrobial properties."
   
  Despite an insufficient understanding of the adverse effects nanoproducts 
could have on health and the environment, big money is pouring into an industry 
expected to grow to $1 trillion by 2010 and several trillion by 2014, which 
governments across the globe are already stimulating with cash injections and 
heavy subsidies.
   
   
  Channel News Asia expects that nanotech will "permeate almost every aspect of 
our lives" in the "time to come."
   
   
  Yet many are worried that nano-scaled toxic particles can be breathed-in more 
easily and would more quickly accumulate in the body. The Economist writes 
"research on animals suggests that nanoparticles can even evade some of the 
body's natural defense systems and accumulate in the brain, cells, blood and 
nerves."
   
   
            "I think it's genetically engineering on steroids, because 
nanotechnology has a much bigger application that will be applied to every 
single aspect of the food chain. 
   
  It's much more scary," said Dr. Rye Senjen 
   

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  For researchers like Dr. Rye Senjen, the primary concern is when food and 
nanotech mix:
   
  "I think it's genetically engineering on steroids, because nanotechnology has 
a much bigger application that will be applied to every single aspect of the 
food chain. It's much more scary," she said.
   
   
  Nano-particles will radicalize food, serving new uncertain functions such as 
preserving lettuce to an extended 30-day shelf life and enhancing food products 
like chocolate with a dazzling synthetic sheen, and will potentially alter the 
nutritional value of a wide range of other foods (for better or for worse).
   
   
  "Some companies want to use nanoparticles as ingredients in the food itself," 
Simon Lauder reports for the Australian Broadcasting Corp. But the potential 
dangers? "Nanoparticles could breach the body's defenses in ways no natural 
food can," he says. 
   
   
   
  Click to join catapultthepropaganda 
   
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join
   
      
Click to join openmindopencodenews 
   
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join
   


   
   
  But the AFP concludes that it is actually the science and tech crowd who are 
more worried about these issues. "Public and political awareness of the 
technology... 
   
  is amazingly low, Nigel Cameron of the Institute on Biotechnology and the 
Human Future told AFP. The report also commented on a poll that surveyed 
reactions to the emerging nanotech industry: 
    "The average Joe and Jane are more worried than the experts that nano will 
cause job losses, an arms race and a loss of privacy, according to the surveys 
published in Nature."
   
   
  Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy warned in 2000 against the potential for 
nanotech to "destroy the biosphere on which all life depends," referring to its 
offers of power as a "Faustian bargain." 
   
   
  Currently, nanotech is heavily subsidized and rapidly gaining investment yet 
under-researched and thus far unregulated. Manufacturers aren't required to 
declare what products have been created with nanotechnology-- and agreed upon 
standards and practices are not yet well-developed. 
   
   
  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENDGAME 1.5: THE PhD COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING THE GLOBAL ELITE
Watch it online at Prison Planet.tv!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
   
  Industry experts are calling for more research money to better understand the 
dangers and risks, which is currently hampered by factors including the "big 
hands" difficulty of accurately measuring and testing the properties of such 
tiny particles.
   
   
  At the same time, the potential benefits of nano-medicine could be enormous. 
   
  Chemistry World reports that certain nano materials may be able to "kill the 
H5N1 bird flu virus","incorporate copper oxide as an antifungal" and use 
"silver for its antibacterial properties." There are also a number of serious 
proposals to use nanobots in the repair of organs or to target viruses and 
agents of disease in the blood system or throughout the body. 
   
   
  Further down the road of nanotech development, leading futurist and inventor 
Ray Kurzweil foresees potential crises such as nanobot wars and epidemics 
generated at the nano-level in his ground-breaking book The Age of Spiritual 
Machines. Just think of the danger it could pose in the hands of the elite, who 
already regard human life as a force to control, regulate and dispose of at 
will. 
   
   
  The potential for autonomous, self replicating and possibly thinking nanobots 
to either use or become mutating pathogens within the drama of a war between 
nanobot factions or against mankind is beyond frightening yet well-enough 
within the realm of things to come that it poses serious questions about the 
survival of the human population... at least in Kurzweil's vision. 
   
   
   
  Whether or not such issues will remain science fiction or later become 
reality remains to be seen. At present, nanotech is little more than a big 
business opportunity with aspirations of infiltrating every niche in the 
market. What its effect could be for health, food, environment, energy, 
machinery, warfare or the human condition has yet to be seen. The nano world is 
still too much an unknown. 
   
   
  FURTHER READING:
   
  Experts: Nanotech Risk Higher Than You Think 
   
  The Economist: The risk in nanotechnology - A little risky business
   
  Nanotechnology a 'bigger concern' than GM foods
   
  Bill Joy: Why the future doesn't need us
   

   
   
  
 





       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Reply via email to