On 16/12/17 04:03, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> 
> Relatedly, coming up on 2018 it seems like it would be reasonable to require 
> a compiler with C++11 support. I’m not sure how backwards compatible PolyML 
> needs to be these days

For Isabelle the situation is documented here:
http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/file/tip/Admin/PLATFORMS#l26

Presently (Isabelle/ad538f6c5d2f) the bottom line e.g. for Linux is
Ubuntu 12.04.


        Makarius
_______________________________________________
polyml mailing list
polyml@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml

Reply via email to