On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:00 AM David Matthews <david.matth...@prolingua.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for looking at this. The focus before the release of 5.8 was on > the X86 and in particular the 32/64 version. The interpreted version > wasn't really tested to the same extent. Since then I've fixed a couple > of bugs that affected the interpreted version when I tested it on ARM > and Mips development boards. Once of these caused a segfault and the > other affected some of the Real32.real arithmetic. These fixed have > been pushed to git master and I'm planning to add them to the fixes-5.8 > branch.
Sure, probably nearly all polyml installations are x86_64, so it makes sense to focus your efforts there. > It would be very helpful if you could rerun your tests with master so I > know whether the bugs you've encountered have actually been fixed. I just did a test build. The logs will be available here for a few days: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33786018 Don't be fooled that it is still called version 5.8. I swapped out the 5.8 tarball for my own tarball made from git master. Both the s390x endianness issue and the ARM floating point issue appear to still be present in master. Note that Fedora uses these flags when building for 32-bit ARM: -march=armv7-a -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mtune=generic-armv7-a -mabi=aapcs-linux -mfloat-abi=hard Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ polyml mailing list polyml@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml
