On Sun Apr 14, 2024 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > Le Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > > On Sun Apr 14, 2024 at 06:52:42PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:25:49AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > > > > The same pattern like in the perverse qt6 flavor diffs. OK? > > > > > > my understanding is that is needed for the huge devel/kf6 monster: > > > in devel/kf6/purpose: the following libraries in WANTLIB look like masked > > > by RUN_DEPENDS: Qt6Core Qt6DBus Qt6Gui Qt6Network Qt6Qml Qt6Widgets > > > Qt6Xml accounts-qt6 kaccounts6 > > > > Hmm, I think this is an issue on your side (My bulk was happy and my > > current local build is happy) > > i have no idea about that, it was on a clean portstree with only your > devel/kf6 tarball. > > > There are some more commits in nicolasfella libaccounts-qt6 repo so I > > bumped the libaccounts-qt (qt5) version. > > what i meant was that this was not "the same code" so something else than > REVISION and SHARED_LIBS should be bumped, hence maybe pl0 :)
Now it's clicked! For sure we need pl0. Thanks! > > > > do the 3 consumers need adaptations or just build fine with this update ? > > > i don't remember if a REVISION bump is needed since you add a flavor, > > > maybe the > > > pkgpath changes ? > > > > > > x11/kde-applications/kio-gdrive > > > x11/kde-applications/akonadi > > > x11/kde-applications/kaccounts-integration > > > > Yes they do. I don't know yet whether I'll do this before the > > kde6-big-bang commit. If so, I'll test it with the current tree and the > > ports. > > if they build then ok with me, with pl0 > > Landry
