On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:27:24PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 04:02:51PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > The SECURITY file for miniupnpd, is only around in the ports tree. > > > > It doesn't get installed, nor echoed out when installing the package, > > > > nor is in pkg_info. Since the users are encouraged to install > > > > packages, they will miss it, right? > > > > > > there is a history of SECURITY files in the ports tree but in this > > > case I think mv'ing it to MESSAGE makes sense. > > > > Yes I asked espie@ around p2k11 if we could kill SECURITY and use > > MESSAGE/README instead but he objected. > > So I 'm using the 'correct' way to do things. > > If we are allowed to kill SECURITY then sure I'll put it in README (not > > MESSAGE, it's useless there). > > Meanwhile I'll keep it as is. > > Copying from SECURITY to README looks fine, I would still prefer not to kill > SECURITY.
But what is the benefit of SECURITY in this case? -- Antoine
