On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:04:41AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > Index: patches/patch-boost_interprocess_detail_transform_iterator_hpp
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: patches/patch-boost_interprocess_detail_transform_iterator_hpp
> > diff -N patches/patch-boost_interprocess_detail_transform_iterator_hpp
> > --- patches/patch-boost_interprocess_detail_transform_iterator_hpp      15 
> > Oct 2012 20:31:59 -0000      1.1
> > +++ /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
> > -$OpenBSD: patch-boost_interprocess_detail_transform_iterator_hpp,v 1.1 
> > 2012/10/15 20:31:59 robert Exp $
> > ---- boost/interprocess/detail/transform_iterator.hpp.orig      Sat Oct 13 
> > 12:35:34 2012
> > -+++ boost/interprocess/detail/transform_iterator.hpp   Sat Oct 13 12:35:40 
> > 2012
> > -@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct operator_arrow_proxy<T&>
> > -    // This function is needed for MWCW and BCC, which won't call 
> > operator->
> > -    // again automatically per 13.3.1.2 para 8
> > - //   operator T*() const { return &m_value; }
> > --   mutable T &m_value;
> > -+   T &m_value;
> > - };
> > -
> > - template <class Iterator, class UnaryFunction>
> 
> This patch won't apply because this patch is upstreamed already in
> previous releases of boost. Please drop this patch otherwise it will
> fail make patch.

That's why the patch is being removed as your original diff did.

> There's a missing patch, please add this and then boost will be
> updated properly.
> https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/commit/6d95c78201d16f0f95ab391b221aad37736b86d5

If you come up with any other patches please send them directly to me.

> what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ?

Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should
comment as to whether it should be added or not.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to