It's relatively new, so it's only in the active branch -- carp. I've also got some NAT code I could probably tweak up a little and push.
-- Murphy On Aug 4, 2013, at 1:15 AM, Sadia Bashir wrote: > Hi Murphy, I am looking for ip_loadbalancer, you suggested me previously, It > is not there in pox-betta/pox/misc and could not get it from here as well: > https://github.com/noxrepo/pox/tree/betta/pox/misc > > any link to download from please? Many thanks. > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:13 AM, kk yap <yap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious on why NAT is not possible. The basic requirement of NAT is > look at the IP addresses and TCP ports, rewrite those, then install the > reverse flow similarly. This should be doable in the most basic of OpenFlow > switches. Are you trying to do this in a proactive manner? > > Regards > KK > > > On 19 July 2013 14:08, Shabbir Ahmed <shabbir1...@gmail.com> wrote: > NAT is not yet possible, u can use iptables for NAT as one interface out of > of-datapath. > > are you trying it on mininet or some other platform? > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> > wrote: > samples.mixed_switches demonstrates treating different switches differently > (which you'll want so that you can treat some as L2 switches and one as your > NAT node). > > I don't think we have a straight NAT component example, though > misc.ip_loadbalancer is maybe not miles and miles from it. > > Hope that helps. Apologies for the brevity, but I'm busy today. :) > > -- Murphy > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Sadia Bashir wrote: > > > Hi everyone, I am new to pox and want to write a POX controller which will > > convert one of the switch from the topology to a NAT Router. Topology > > consists of 3 L2 switches, 1 L3 switch which POX-controller should convert > > to NATting device and other L2 switches are connected to the L3 switch. > > Each switch is connected to two hosts and it also includes two private and > > one public subnet. Any sample code or help will be appreciated. Thanks! > > > > > > > -- > >
