Lapindo Mexico tidak sama dengan Lapindo Sidoarjo. Lapindo Mexico tidak
berkutik terhadap pemerintah USA, tetapi Lapindo Sidoarjo berani berkutik
bahkan membantah tanggung jawab, karena turut dalam pemerintahan NKRI
----- Original Message -----
From: anton john hartomo
To: 'ppi india'
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 8:19 PM
Subject: [ppiindia] LAPINDO mexico
CitraSatelit, 17May2010
COVINGTON, La. – Day by day, the oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico is
adding up to mind-boggling numbers.
Using worst case scenarios calculated by
scientists, a month's worth of leaking oil could fill enough gallon milk jugs
to stretch more than 11,300 miles. That's more than the distance from New York
to Buenos Aires, Argentina, and back. That's just shy of 130 million gallons.
If the government's best case scenario is used — and only 5.25 million
gallons have spilled — those milk jugs would cover a bit more than a roundtrip
between New York and Washington. But the government is revising that number,
with a team of scientists working around the clock to come up with a more
realistic and likely higher figure.
Here's another way to think of just how much oil has gushed out since April
20: At worst, it's enough to fill 102 school gymnasiums to the ceiling with
oil.
That's nothing compared to the vast expanse of the Gulf of Mexico, where
there are 643 quadrillion gallons. Even under the worst
case scenario, the Gulf has five billion drops of water for every drop
of oil. And the mighty Mississippi River pours
3.3 million gallons of new water into Gulf every second.
Under the rosiest scenario, little more than four gyms would be filled. That's
how the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
visualizes oil spill volumes on one of its
websites.
At worst, the amount of oil that has already spilled is a dozen times more
than the Exxon Valdez disaster. At best, it's
only half as bad. Realistically, it's probably somewhere in that huge middle
in
between.
No matter what, it already is way too much oil for the delicate parts of the
Gulf ecosystem, said Darryl Felder, a biologist at the University
of Louisiana Lafayette.
"A lot of this is diffused now in deep layers," said Felder, who
is coordinating a seven-volume scientific encyclopedia on the Gulf. "It's
like it's under the rug. You can't see it on the surface, so it's kind of out
of sight, out of mind. But it's not out of mind to most of the biologists who
are concerned about its long-term effects."
There are many uncertainties about how much has spilled. It's not even clear
if the leak began on April 20, when the rig exploded, or April 22 when the rig
sank, or on April 24 when the Coast Guard first noticed two leaks.
Originally, BP and the federal government said 42,000 gallons were flowing
per day. Then the number was upped to 210,000 and that's been the best case
scenario, with calculations that the spill didn't start until April 24.
The best case scenario seems increasingly unlikely. On Thursday, BP
acknowledged more oil than that is pouring into the Gulf. The company said its
makeshift tube put in place to suck up the leak is siphoning 210,000 gallons a
day into a barge — the full amount of oil the company said was leaking. Yet,
there's still lots of oil flowing out into the Gulf that can now be seen live
on a webcam.
"Anyone can look at that and determine that even though it can't be
metered or measured, it's significantly less than it was," said company
spokesman Steve Rinehart. "That suggests pretty clearly that taking 5,000
barrels a day (210,000 gallons) out of that stream puts a real dent in
it."
BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles said Friday the tube is now sucking
about 92,400 gallons of oil a day to the surface. It was much less than the
figure the company used several times a day earlier, but Suttles said the
higher number is the most the tube had been sucking up at any one time, while
the lower number is the average over 24 hours.
Federal officials acknowledge their 210,000 gallons-a-day figure for the
total amount spilling needs to be revised. NOAA director
Jane Lubchenco said the old estimate was based on a long-held
international scientific formula based on surface slick observations. But the
way this oil slick changed makes that calculation
no longer useful, she said.
The worst-case scenario is based on the upper end of broad estimates from
several scientists for the daily flow rate of the leak based on video
observation — somewhere between 840,000 gallons a day and 4.2 million gallons
a
day.
New live video of the oil spill — along with
criticism from BP — had scientists altering those estimates in both
directions.
Tim Crone of Columbia University said that he was "really saddened"
when he looked at the new video. He said he had hoped his estimate of 840,000
to 4.2 million gallons a day was wrong, but the video showed it wasn't. Crone
upped his lower estimate to 1.68 million gallons and is sticking with his
higher estimate for the main oil leak.
But Purdue University professor Steve Wereley said he will likely cut his
estimate of 3.9 million gallons a day after BP said about half of what is
flowing out of the pipe is gas, not oil. His estimate has a 20 percent margin
of error and includes about 1 million gallons coming from a leak at the
blowout
preventer, away from the main leak.
Some experts say the 4.2 million gallon rate is probably way too high, just
like the government figures are way too low. That's because somewhere around
1.2 million to 1.6 million gallons a day is all that can realistically be
expected from that type of well if it were working right, they said.
Ian McDonald, a Florida State University oceanographer and expert tracking
the spill, said both estimates were wrong, but the government figure is
especially wrong.
"We don't know how bad this is," McDonald said Thursday. "One
of the problems is it's going to be very hard to know."
McDonald said the spill's surface slick is now more than 14,600 square miles,
larger than the states of Maryland and Delaware
combined.
___
Borenstein reported from Washington
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
=======
Wiadomosc przeskanowana przez Spyware Doctor � nie znaleziono wirus�w ani
spyware.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, baza wirus�w/spyware: 6.15050)
http://www.pctools.com
=======
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
