http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jan2005/aceh-j26.shtml

Sharp divisions in Jakarta over foreign presence in Aceh
By John Roberts
26 January 2005
In the aftermath of the tsunami disaster, divisions have opened up in 
Indonesian ruling circles over the policy to be pursued in the hard-hit 
province of Aceh in northern Sumatra. As of yesterday, officials lifted the 
death toll to a staggering 228,000. At least 500,000 people are homeless, the 
province's limited infrastructure has been shattered and the threat of 
widespread disease remains.

The political differences in Jakarta have nothing to do with the plight of 
survivors. Sections of the military are in favour of intensifying the war 
against the separatist rebels of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and are 
distinctly nervous about the presence of foreign troops, aid workers and 
journalists. The administration of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, however, 
is under pressure from the major powers, particularly the US, to modify its 
stance and engage in peace talks with GAM leaders.

On January 12, Vice President Jusuf Kalla announced that the military forces 
from 30 countries engaged in emergency relief work in Aceh would have to leave 
by no later than March 26. Kalla stated that he wanted the winding down of 
operations to start by February 26. The sooner foreign troops were gone the 
better, he declared.

Kalla was joined by other senior figures, including Indonesian armed forces 
(TNI) chief Endriartono Sutarto, cabinet secretary Sudi Silalahi and Welfare 
Minister Alwi Shihab. All have called for an early exit of foreigners and for 
restrictions to be placed on their movement. Endriartono called for "the 
foreign presence" to be limited to the capital Banda Aceh and the west coast 
town of Meulaboh, except with military permission.

These statements were certainly a calculated appeal to Indonesian nationalism. 
Given the widespread opposition to the illegal US-led occupation of Iraq, it is 
hardly surprising that many people are rightly suspicious about the Bush 
administration's motives in sending troops to Aceh. Washington has long had 
designs on the Strait of Malacca adjacent to Sumatra-one of the world's key 
strategic shipping lanes. Aceh itself has significant gas and oil reserves.

Anti-US hostility has been further fuelled by the initial indifference of Bush 
and other world leaders to the tragedy. An article in the New York Times on 
January 12 noted "a groundswell of opinion" in Indonesia complaining that the 
price of foreign aid was the surrender of national sovereignty. The newspaper 
referred to a text message being widely circulated in the capital that posed 
the question: "After Iraq, will Indonesia be the next US target?"

The motivation of Kalla and the military in imposing restrictions on aid 
operations was quite different. The TNI has waged a vicious war for nearly 
three decades aimed at destroying GAM and terrorising the local population. 
After a lull in the conflict following the fall of Suharto in 1998, President 
Megawati Sukarnoputri imposed a state of emergency on the province in May 2003 
and authorised a full-scale offensive by 50,000 troops and paramilitary police.

At least 2,000 people have been killed in Aceh over the past 20 months. There 
were widespread reports of atrocities against the civilian population by 
Indonesian security forces before all foreigners and journalists were banned 
from the province under martial law regulations. Despite the restrictions, 
there have been continuing reports of arbitrary arrests, torture, 
extra-judicial killings and other abuses by Indonesian troops, which Jakarta 
clearly wants to keep hidden from the world.

Following Kalla's announcement, however, there was an abrupt shift in policy. 
On January 16, following a meeting with US Deputy Secretary of Defence Paul 
Wolfowitz, Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono issued a statement that undercut 
Kalla's remarks. He explained that March 26 was not "a deadline" for foreign 
military personnel to leave, but rather "a benchmark" for the Indonesian 
government to improve its relief efforts and take over the major burden of the 
operation.

Clearly, pressure had been exerted behind the scenes. For more than a year, the 
US, Australia and other powers have turned a blind eye, and thus condoned, the 
TNI's latest campaign of repression in Aceh. In the wake of the tsunami, 
however, the conflict threatens to cut across Washington's plans to use the 
tragedy to pursue its interests in the region. As a result, the US is now 
pushing Jakarta to reach a deal with GAM.

On his return to the US, Wolfowitz told the PBS "NewsHour" program: "We have a 
chance to give some meaning to that (tsunami) tragedy by moving to a better 
future, including particularly trying to move toward a political resolution of 
that problem in Aceh." He then warned: "If the (Indonesian) military gets in 
the way of that, then the military should be pushed to get out of the way."

Sections of the military, however, are not willing to halt the war. 
Resource-rich provinces such as Aceh and West Papua have long been lucrative 
sources of income for the TNI leadership. Only about one-third of the 
military's operating costs come from the defence budget. The rest comes from an 
extensive network of business operations, legal and illegal, including the 
extortion of "protection money" from resource project operators.

Despite the devastation in Aceh, the army has continued its operations against 
GAM, claiming that rebels have threatened relief supplies. As if to answer 
Wolfowitz, army chief General Ryamizard Ryacudu announced on January 20 that 
the military "had no choice but to kill at least 120 GAM rebels and seize their 
weapons". A report on the Borneo Bulletin website stated that of the 35,000 
troops currently in Aceh, 15,000 are being used to support relief operations 
and 20,000 are on "security" operations.

Comments by State Intelligence Agency (BIN) chief Syamsir Siregar to a 
parliamentary committee on January 20 indicated the thinking within military 
circles. He said the families of many GAM fighters had been wiped out and that 
GAM units "are now experiencing a shortage of logistics and manpower". The 
implication was that now was a good time for the TNI to go on the offensive.

There are also signs that the military is exploiting the relief camps to 
increase their control over the local population. The New York Times on January 
18 noted the concerns of displaced Acehnese at being put into 24 resettlement 
centres under the eye of the military.

"[T]he notion of large numbers of people in close quarters guarded by soldiers 
raises sour memories-and some real fear," the newspaper wrote. "In various 
phases of the long-running civil conflict, the government has herded people 
into relocation camps, often after houses were destroyed by the army. Under the 
banner of security, the government used the camps to keep separatist rebels 
from mixing with local populations."

Like Defence Minister Sudarsono, other sections of the Indonesian ruling elite, 
including the military, need a closer alliance with Washington. In the course 
of his visit to Jakarta, Wolfowitz held out the prospect of renewed ties 
between the American and Indonesian armed forces, broken off following TNI 
atrocities in East Timor in 1991 and again in 1999.

Still floundering economically after the 1997-98 Asian economic crisis, 
Indonesia is also desperate for financial assistance and foreign investment. 
Yudhoyono told foreign investors on January 17 that the government required 
$US145 billion for a massive upgrading of the country's infrastructure, as well 
as $US4 billion to replace Aceh's destroyed facilities. Of this, $10 billion 
would have to come from foreign donors and $80 billion from foreign investors.

Foreign investors have been pushing Jakarta for further economic restructuring, 
including an end to rampant corruption and more openness in the country's legal 
and financial systems. Reining in the military is viewed as a necessary 
precondition. State Minister for National Development Planning Sri Mulyani 
Indrawati recently told an economic conference that the relief operations in 
Aceh were regarded as a test case for the Yudhoyono regime. "They want to see 
how we manage the situation, whether with confidence or confusion," she said.

The Yudhoyono administration obviously understood the message from Wolfowitz: 
without moves to end the conflict in Aceh, US economic and military assistance 
would not be forthcoming. A high-ranking group of ministers is due to fly out 
of Jakarta for Finland today for discussions with exiled GAM leaders. There is 
no doubt, however, that military commanders will resist any deal that threatens 
the TNI's influence and interests in Aceh.

See Also:
In the wake of tsunami calamity 
Indonesian army steps up war in Aceh
[5 January 2005]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/S.QlOD/3MnJAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke