SYDNEY MORNING HERALD ANNOUNCES THAT ASIANISATION OF AUSTRALIA IS ON!!
========================================================================
There was always more to the republic than the creation of an Australian
Head of State. The National Watchman No 7 (October 1999) stated that
"THE REPUBLIC AND THE GST MEET IN AN ASIAN DESTINY. THE TREASURER RECENTLY
LEAKED THE REAL REASON FOR THE GOVERNMENT STEALING TAX. IT IS REQUIRED FOR
THE ENTRY OF AUSTRALIA INTO AN ECONOMIC SUPERSTATE. THE REPUBLIC’S
CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES COMPLETE THE NECESSARY LAW THAT WILL ALLOW THE
PRESIDENT OF ‘AUSTRALASIA’ TO RULE AUSTRALIA."
For those that doubted the above as dramatic it is salient to note that the
Asianisation of Australia is now officially part of the mainstream media
push as all Australians are educated to the 'benefits' of globalisation.
Pulling no punches The Sydney Morning Herald’s Spectrum (Saturday March 18
2000) article ALL OUR TOMORROW's reviewed the possible future political
integration of Australian and Indonesia. Today, for the article's author
Richard Tanter, “there is a possibility of a shared future, if we can find
it and face it”. For he predicts that Indonesia will invade Australia; the
logical solution (for a disarmed Australia) is to coalesce now and avoid
the bloodshed. The result will be “in some sense a return to the
pre-imperial South East Asia in which borders mattered less”.
When Tanter's "result" is focused upon many of the changes in the northern
parts of Australia congeal into a mass of definite form. For instance
hidden in his article was the following paragraph that describes the covert
attempts by elements in Australia to disenfranchise "Heritage" Australians
of more land rights in preparation for that eventual day.
“The Mabo case led to recognition of prior ownership of the Australian
continent by its indigenous inhabitants. Building on Mabo, Australian
lawyers have proposed that Australia recognise the traditional fishing
rights of Indonesian fishermen from the island of Roti, near the western
tip of Timor. For more than 400 years these people have fished for shark,
trepang, trochus, sponges and molluscs in the shallow waters around Ashmore
Reef of north-western Australia”
After giving land rights to Aborigines we are being told we must give them
to Indonesians. Simply translated this is "Economic Integration" carried on
by subterfuge and enforced in law courts rather than in the parliament by
the politicians.
The reader will soon see, as this article progresses, that Economic
Integration cannot be separated from Political Integration. What the Sydney
Morning Herald makes clear is that Australia is to be joined to Indonesian
and then into an Asian Economic Trading block. The Australian Heritage
culture will disappear in the change.
The concerns of the Australian citizen, your concerns, will not count in
the splendid vision of the elites. It is as Paul Keating made clear that “
The case for re-defining Australia as an Asian country was grounded on the
assumption that economies over-rule culture in shaping the destiny of
nations”. YES - ECONOMIES OVERRULE CULTURE ! In this process even the High
Court is prepared to overturn fundamental legal doctrine and its own case
law to achieve the results of the real 'controllers' of our society.
The Federal government’s is not immune from the 'controllers'. Thus the
National Library of Australia, for instance, has canceled orders for books
and newspapers about Western civilisation. Simply, under the New World
Order Asianisation plan, Australia is to be made ‘Indonesia literate’ in
preparation for our final integration into the Asian region.
The Northern Territory, due to its close proximity to Indonesia and
'direct' control by Canberra, has been the first state to Asianise. John
Hepworth, University of South Australia lecturer in South East Asian
politics summed up the situation. “[W]ith its long term Asian population
and proximity, Darwin has become much more a minor provincial town of
South East Asia than an Australian city”. (The Sydney Morning Herald, Good
Weekend Magazine -22/02/1997). Our educational integration with Indonesia
is well under way with the necessary educational assimilation of
Australia’s young. “More than 80 percent of all primary school children in
Darwin study Indonesian from the age of five”.
The University of the Northern Territory has canceled its English
Literature courses, substituting Indonesia and Chinese literature, to
assist their focus on the Asian region. ABC television (7/7/97) reported
that the core of the English department has been sacked. The Daily
Telegraph clarifies the reality of the Asianisation that has been completed
in Northern Territory's educational institutions.
"Some literary studies will still be available - through Indonesian and
Chinese literature, and as components of units in such areas as Black
Studies and Women’s Studies”. Hence in the future the “university will
concentrate on Indonesia studies and Aboriginal studies” (Daily Telegraph
26/06/1997)
Today Indonesia is a major player in the Australian meat market. The GOOD
WEEKEND MAGAZINE (Sydney Morning Herald 22/02/1997) detailed how one
Indonesian family now owns 1.5% of the Northern Territory with a further 1%
owned by the Sultan of Brunei. That is nearly 3% of the land area of the
Northern Territory owned by Indonesian South East Asia - at a minimum.
(This was detailed in only a single article after what appears preliminary
research by a single reporter).
“The Sultan of Brunei now owns three of the Territories biggest cattle
properties. The Sabah Government has three stations covering more than
9,000 sq km and the Sarawak Government has one. And the biggest foreign
land investor in the Northern Territory is now the Indonesian Bakrie
family group, following its $ 100 million plus purchase of 11 stations and
18,800 sq km of land from the Warran Anderson Tippery group in 1993”.
Tanter’s article, reviewed in the above light, makes certain the intent of
many of our politician's concealed statements on Asia. Review the following
in light of Tanter's article and thesis.
The former Treasurer and Prime Minister of Australia said in 1997 that, “"I
am utterly convinced that our prosperity, our national well-being, our
ability to maintain and build a good society, depends upon our courage in
moving boldly to integrate our economy with the economies of Asia".
William Hayden , former leader of the Labor Party and subsequently Governor
General. “I believe that if you look at things in the span of history, and
not in one man's lifetime, we will become not just a multicultural society
which seem to be a soft sort of terminology anyway, we will become a
Eurasian society and we will be all the better for it” (Melbourne Age May
10 th 1983) or "It is inevitable that Australia will become an Eurasian
country.... A new race will emerge; I happen to think that this is
desirable" (Asia Week 19 / 8/ 1983 pp.7)
Perhaps this understanding, i.e. that the Asianisation of Australia is
being planed by both major parties, is why the editor of The Bangkok Post
had the confidence to say "Australians have to come to terms with the
inevitability of their Asian destiny".
Tanter can, after many years of push by Australian politicians, with
confidence correctly state that “‘Indonesia’ and ‘Australia’ are today part
of the same global economic system”. The ECONOMIC INTEGRATION is now
accepted as a fact! “Indeed," Tanter says, "the two countries, apparently
so different, were formed by the same pressures that are still transforming
the world today”.
Tanter is correct although not in his sense. The reality is that world is
being transformed by an elite caste : Tanter's "same pressures" are simply
the elite caste who now have direct control over the governments of the
world. Tanter is forced to ask, by the evolution of his argument and the
reality of the new Australian political condition, “Is it absurd...to
think about an Asian Community, or a South-East Asian Community? Already
both countries are part of the stuttering Asia Pacific Economic
Co-Operation (APEC) Forum”. This of course is a self answering question as
the facts that Tanter provides can hardly be absurd!
The real purpose of APEC can now be seen if it is viewed as a vehicle to
bring into being the primary infrastructure around which political
integration into an Asian superstate can take place. Today this is under
way in subtle ways. China has purchased the South Australian electricity
grid. We now purchase steel from Asia. The Courier Mail, as long ago as
1992 (21/04/92), noted,
"An award winning Brisbane computer software company has sold an
administration package to the Australian and Indonesian defence force in a
sales pitch which could link the armies of South-East Asia on one
multi-million dollar computer". Simply the future plan for the integration
of Australia and Indonesia's military forces is well in place. We do not
train Indonesians soldiers just because they are our regional neighbour.
Ominously, the end result of political integration will be that Australia
is governed by Asia, through APEC, or a similar body; this will be
AustralAsia. With this process the creation of the AustralAsia is to follow
the standard formula that was used, by the New World Order planners, for
the creation of the European Economic Community. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
FOLLOWED BY POLITICAL INTEGRATION
Changes will of course have to be made to incorporate this brave new vision
of the elites. One casualty must be the Australian concept of the political
system. "Democracy", says Tanter in the Sydney Morning Herald ”,in
Australia as much as Indonesia, needs rethinking on the basis of shared
transnational interests to regulate highly mobile capital". Translated we
must accommodate the desires and plans of the 'elite caste' of the New
World Order.
Tanter, of course, is able to put the correct spin on this. "Yet the
mobility of capital in this age of globalisation mocks and exploits the
caste solidarities of nation labour. Nothing is easier than to close a
factory in Wangarattta and move it to Tangerang. If we were to take things
seriously in this single system, we would be looking for ways to equalise
labour condition in the two places. That is already happening, but on the
worst possible terms on both sides...What is needed is some frame work that
will begin to allow a flow of labour to be the two parts of this single,
imaginary system of "Indonesia” and "Australia". At the same time there
should develop a "leveling up" (instead of the current "leveling down") of
the political and environmental playing field in which labour is brought
and sold."
Fine words and a wonderful spin. Somehow I cannot see a mass Australian
migration to Indonesia to experience their labour conditions. Thus
personally this writer has more belief in the words of Neil Baird ( News
Report Issue 62 Tuesday March 21 2000 - Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]) who
wrote,
" Welcome to Howard's brave new labor world. We have started on the path to
two very distinct parallel yet divergent societies - Similar to China's
Hong Kong - One Country / Two Systems.
The workers increasingly will be rostered 12 -14 hour shifts in a 24 hour
clock. The starting and finishing times of shifts will vary based on the
flexible needs of the employer and not of the employee. Families will come
under increasing strain and yet more will not survive, not that many are
surviving now. Children will increasing rarely see one of the parents. This
will lead progressively to the dumbing down of the next generation, even
more than has already occurred.
The workers will increasingly be driven down into economic slavery. Real
wages stagnating and then falling rapidly, once the Unions are completely
emasculated. The working conditions progressively worsening until they are
not much better than Malaysia... But not stopping there, until they are
ultimately on a par with China, Indonesia and India. The lowest common
denominator."
While Tanter's article is hidden in conjecture he does, finally, declare
what for our politicians must be a known fact. "An Asian version of the
European Economic Community would involve a great deal more than APEC's
deregulation of trade barriers...Is a new category of shared
"Indonesia-Australian “citizenship inconceivable?" Nothing is to stop the
jingoism that will lead us into an alliance with Indonesia for somehow,
Tanter makes clear, “three decades of dictatorship and mass murder...makes
it all the more important to do exactly that”.
The summary of all this is that ECONOMIES OVERRULE CULTURE and POLITICAL
INTEGRATION MUST FOLLOW economic integration. But this is not the most
important point. All this can only come about AFTER the removal of
Australia’s current racial and political heritage. The Anglo Saxon
Westminster System dominated by a Constitutional Crown. Our legal and
political integration with Britain must be removed before our political and
legal integration with Asia.
In the above context it is interesting to note the exploits of Mr. Jason
Yat-Sen who was the ‘superstar’ of the Constitutional Convention; without
his cleverness there would, today, be no republic. At the convention he was
one of the few, privileged “ungrouped”; representing no particular group
because of his ‘charisma’ and credentials of power.
The Sydney Morning Herald (12/02/98) reported on his last minute deal that
created the Republic that was brought before the Australian people in
November. Mr. Yat Sen Li’s photo dwarfed all else on the front page of
Sydney’s ‘newspaper of record’. Under his photo, in an emphatic style were
words, which almost credited Yat Sen Li as being the sole architect of the
republic; they were “The republic Jason Li helped build”. On page four
followed a second story on this amazing Asian constitution builder. This
story was titled “Jason’s republican coup”.
In the last days of the Constitutional Convention the factions could not
come to agreement. The last minute peace deal forged was the work of Jason;
the Sydney Morning Herald described this as ‘Jason’s day’, so powerful was
his role in bringing the republic about.
“One of the youngest delegates, Mr. Jason Yat-Sen Li , became a star when
Mr. Turnbull incorporated his ideas for community consultation in electing
a president in the winning republican model....[the day] belonged to Jason,
a young man busy in the back rooms and corridors of Old Parliament House,
helping to plan the future shape of the nation”.
Mr. Jason Yat-Sen Li is one Asian Australian who understands that British
culture must perish for the vision of the elites, an Asianised Australia,
to exist. "For Non English Speaking Background (NESB) Australians," has
said, "becoming a republic will signify an end to Australia kow-towing to
British institutions and British superiority. It will mean that those who
cling to the power and status of the former British empire will no longer
find an official ally in the symbols of our nation...Those proud of their
British heritage have every right to be so, but they cannot use that pride
as a reason for preserving the Monarchy in modern multicultural Australia.
Becoming a republic is about proclaiming that Australia now belongs to [the
NESB] Australians in all their diversity." (The University of New South
Wales Law Journal June 1998 V 4 No 2 P 31)
With these words Mr. Jason Yat-Sen Li makes clear that the republic is
integral in the Asianisaiton of Australia. Multiculturalism is but a
precursor to our entry into the Asian trading block and the final handover
of sovereign control to Asian forces and eventually One World Government.
The political reality that none dare say, in the age of political
correctness, is this. The republic seals the fate of Australia to an Asian
future; in accepting a republic Australians will have accepted their ‘Asian
destiny’. This is a clear choice but clarity does not ease the burden of
the understanding.
Today our politician's multicultural dream has now met the political
reality. Today Asia owns major parts of Australia, Asia own Australia’s
industry and Asians occupy major portions of Australia’s cities. Our
education system is now directed to our Asian destiny. Our military is
linked into Asian command structures; in our next war with Asia Australians
will die under Asian commanders. Everything that Asia sought in World War
II and the ‘heritage’ Australians fought to prevent has been achieved in a
time of peace with the aid of globalist political parties. The republic
will complete the peaceful conquest. The end result must be as predicted by
Tanter and endorsed by the Sydney Morning Herald : an Australia controlled
by an Asian Economic Community.
Kerry Spencer-Salt B.E., LL.B (Hons)
The National Watchman
Australian Community Organisation
P.O. Box 136, Surry Hills NSW 2010
Phone : (02) 9360 0610
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website : www.rockroll.com.au/watchman
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
