Hi John,
......As solicitors charge at the rate
of $360.00/hr +/- perhaps not quite as bad as it might seem?
Doctors, dentists, vets, engineers and other such professionals also
receive like or even greater fees. In fairness, with the appropriate
qualifications and experience, such salaries are possibly at best
only equivalent to those otherwise available to them in the public
sector. Thought exists that judges in higher jurisdictions could
receive even greater salaries (as in the US) with the possibility that
any improper influence by major defendant corporations becomes less likely.
However, that said, qualifications and ongoing performance of
any government servant at certain salary levels should surely be open to
public scrutiny? For whatever it is worth, my strong view remains that the
judicial appointment process (particularly those for the higher courts)
should follow prudent US lines. It is also my very strong
belief, from experience and certain knowledge, that our judges must
be required by law to publically declare personal/ family (direct and
indirect) interests/investments/assets, and where a judge has even the
remotest such interest or link with any matter subject of
a case coming before them then this must be divulged in open court, noted on the
transcript and left solely for the plaintiff, rather than the Judge, to decide
whether or not they should properly hear that case: furthermore all
side and other comments, statements, particularly "quiet instructions
regarding examination of defendant witnesses", et al, from the bench
must be recorded in the transcript. Microphone "switches" behind
the bench must , in the interests of honesty and justice, be
removed.
Best regards,
Robyn
|
- Salaries of State Judges John Wilson
- Re: Salaries of State Judges Van Rheeden
- Re: Salaries of State Judges succeed
- Re: Salaries of State Judges Van Rheeden
- Re: Salaries of State Judges Van Rheeden
- Re: Salaries of State Judges succeed
- Re: Salaries of State Judges Van Rheeden