On 11/5/10 1:41 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
The 303 debate has prompted me to re-look at the definition of
wdrs:describedby - and it's obvious that the POWDER WG (which I
chaired), made an error.
I've begun the process of seeking to change the spec so that the range
restriction on this property will be removed [1]. Therefore,
wdrs:describedby, like the @rel link, will be able to point to any
kind of descriptive resource and will not imply that the description
is provided in POWDER.
I hope, therefore, that there will be no need to define a new property
of isDefinedBy.
Cheers
Phil.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2010Nov/0002.html
Hopefully not :-)
All the gaps are being plugged, our general narrative is getting clear
by the second, re. Linked Data, Methinks!
Dogfooding is a great thing re. tech QA.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
