On Jun 15, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:

> On 15 June 2011 18:30, Pat Hayes <pha...@ihmc.us> wrote:
> 
>> Boy, that is a humdinger of a non-sequiteur. Given that HTTP has 
>> flexibility, it is OK to identify a description of a thing with the actual 
>> thing? To me that sounds like saying, given that movies are projected, it is 
>> OK to say that fish are bicycles.
> 
> Not that I think I did a non-sequiteur, it is totally ok to say that
> fish are bicycles, if that's what you want to say.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> OK, thanks. Here is your argument, as far as I can understand it.
>> 
>> 1. HTTP representations may be partial or incomplete. (Agreed.)
>> 2. HTTP reps can have many different media types, and this is OK. (Agreed, 
>> though I cant see what relevance this has to anything.)
>> 3. A description is a kind of representation. (Agreed, and there was no need 
>> to get into the 'isomorphism' trap. We in KRep have been calling 
>> descriptions "representations" for decades now.)
>> 
>> 4. Therefore, a HTTP URI can simultaneously be understood as referring to a 
>> document and a car.
>> 
>> Whaaat? How in Gods name can you derive this conclusion from those premises?
> 
> my wording could be better, but I stand by it...  a document
> describing the car, through HTTP, can be an equally valid
> representation of the named car resource as the car itself (as long as
> it's qualified by media type)
> 

Not only do I not follow your reasoning, I don't even know what it is you are 
saying. The document is a valid *representation* of the car, yes of course. But 
as valid as the car itself? So you think a car is a representation of itself? 
Or are you drawing a contrast between the 'named car resource' and the car 
itself? ??? 

Maybe it would be best if we just dropped this now. I gather that you were 
offering me a way to make semantic sense of something, but Im not getting any 
sense at all out of this discussion, I am afraid.

Pat

> Cheers,
> Danny.
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://danny.ayers.name
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes






Reply via email to