Hi Hugh, > By the way, as is well-known I think, a lot of people use and therefore must > be happy with URIs that are not Range-14 compliant, such as > http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema .
Your general point that there is non-compliant data out there that people are still able to make use of is probably right, but that specific example is compliant - those are all (even the ontology URI) hash-URIs. Dave