Hi Hugh,

> By the way, as is well-known I think, a lot of people use and therefore must 
> be happy with URIs that are not Range-14 compliant, such as 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema .

Your general point that there is non-compliant data out there that
people are still able to make use of is probably right, but that
specific example is compliant - those are all (even the ontology URI)
hash-URIs.

Dave



Reply via email to