I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ <https://sparqlycode.com/> . It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year.
Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code. Paul Worrall Interition: wisdom in the web web: www.interition.net, www.zonafide.net email: paul.worr...@interition.net twitter: @interition mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213 phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196 eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806 Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, Nuneaton,CV13 6ES > On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <g...@ninebynine.org> wrote: > > On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap >> >> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not >> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects. > > Just a thought: would DOAP + PROV fit the bill? > > #g > -- > >
