Many thanks for this clarification, Ivan. Like Matthias, I was a bit confused regarding the status of this proposal, as I went though the current OWL 1.1 proposal a little while back. As David stated at the outset, there are several issues we'll need resolved, several of which are clearly taken on directly by the current OWL 1.1 proposal. Cheers, Bill On Sep 21, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
Bill Bug Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics www.neuroterrain.org Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy Drexel University College of Medicine 2900 Queen Lane Philadelphia, PA 19129 215 991 8430 (ph) 610 457 0443 (mobile) 215 843 9367 (fax) Please Note: I now have a new email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any accompanying attachments are confidential. This information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. |
- Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unmet needs David Decraene
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unmet ne... Alan Ruttenberg
- RE: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unme... David Decraene
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unme... Matthias Samwald
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: ... Ivan Herman
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in O... William Bug
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unmet ne... Alan Rector
- Re: Modeling large scale ontologies in OWL: Unmet ne... Phillip Lord