Dear Colleagues,
Below are pasted the minutes of the Content sub-group for the PDDI DDI
Minimum Information Model Task Force [1].
Minutes for 4/29/2016 (Content subgroup)
In Attendance : Evan Draper, Lori Idemoto, Brian LeBaron, Sam Habiel,
Richard Boyce, Michael Liebman, Dan Malone, Scott Nelson, John Poikonen,
Scott Nelson
Meeting recording: http://goo.gl/lbmkDI(some missing audio for the first
2 minutes)
Meeting:
*
Update from the Standard subteam
o
Toward writing an Interest Group Note
+
Rich re-organized the initial draft note to focus on
introduction and background with stakeholder descriptions,
use cases, and user scenarios
#
An github project and initial draft:
*
GitHub project: https://github.com/W3C-HCLS/w3c-ddi
*
Example draft : http://goo.gl/7ZaE94
+
Rich created google docs that we will write in and then the
editors will migrate the content into the W3C note format
#
These are linked to from the http://goo.gl/7ZaE94 and
also listed here:
*
Introduction and motivation for the W3C DDI Minimum
Information Model IG Note <https://goo.gl/YWRMV3>
*
Stakeholder Descriptions
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AbWuONYTrFOV95OhjlRwrm3ZJy5jjvzJ-dywO5OZyFY/edit#>
*
DDI Minimum Information Model User Scenarios
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HE8r8nmJBHRrtbE6YrNfK00Ztkev44-dNk-Rm6MP92U/edit>
*
Knowledge Representation Core Considerations
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/14saXL4qhusPHxxN1Aymc5z_u7vH3j3V-YF9TKNjRxLQ/edit>
o
Progress on definitions
+
Discussion of stakeholders
#
Rich has pulled this into two google docs in the format
of user profile and scenarios for discussion by the
sub-team with the goal of finalizing by the next call
*
Stakeholder Descriptions
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AbWuONYTrFOV95OhjlRwrm3ZJy5jjvzJ-dywO5OZyFY/edit#>and
DDI Minimum Information Model User Scenarios
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HE8r8nmJBHRrtbE6YrNfK00Ztkev44-dNk-Rm6MP92U/edit>
o
He will send a request to complete a qualtrics
survey eliciting feedback on each user scenario
+
We agreed as a team to use the following process for moving
the current suggested definitions
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhUp496riwZ0AHqRP7I85oEvuP2jjEI0rcw1Fcm2zI8/edit#gid=0>to
final definitions as follows:
#
For a given information category (e.g., clinical
consequences) Rich will summarize the currently
suggested candidate definitions
*
Including any references to the terminologies or
publications where they came from
*
He will also show examples of the definitions from
the contextualizing decision trees created for the
included interactions
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DIeIuo7tZ6nVvd6MdO2xzzLtOSPXjAHI-DdBe9M3kiw/edit>
#
Rich will create a qualtrics survey for each summary to
elicit agreement on a final proposed definition
*
This process likely be iterative
*
PDDIs to focus on
o
The content workgroup agreed upon 10 PDDIs to include:
https://goo.gl/rYpmjt
+
These cover the following information aspects:
#
can (and should) be contextualized for specific patients
or clinical circumstances,
#
applies at the class level, does not apply at the class
level,
#
the mechanism is known and is pharmacokinetic, the
mechanism is known and is pharmacodynamic
+
More forthcoming...
o
Decision trees useful for contextualizing the PDDIs, provide
management options, and linking to relevant evidence will be
created for all of them
+
Done already for 2 of the 10 now included
#
It was agreed that Rich could share the completed
decision trees with standard development team members as
PDF documents with clear attribution and a “do not
share” watermark
*
Next steps
o
All will complete doodles to schedule new meetings for the next
few months
o
Rich will create a qualtrics survey for each summary to elicit
feedback/suggestions on two PDDIs for which the mechanism is not
known
+
Other surveys will likely follow to finalize the PDDIs for
the remaining categories
o
Work will begin on decision trees for the accepted pairs -
review can occur at each of the next meetings
--
Richard D Boyce, PhD
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics
Faculty, Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing
Faculty, Geriatric Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Gero-Informatics Research and
Training Program
University of Pittsburgh
rd...@pitt.edu
Office: 412-648-9219
Twitter: @bhaapgh
