The draft minutes from the January 7 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 14 January 2010 (the next
Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Web Applications Working Group Teleconference
07 Jan 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010JanMar/0053.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-irc
Attendees
Present
David, Art, Steven, Marcos, Robin, Marcin_Hanclik, Marcin,
Josh
Regrets
Frederick
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Review and tweak agenda
2. [6]Announcements
3. [7]Letter from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4
4. [8]Status of URI Scheme spec
5. [9]Status of View Modes Media Features (VM-MF) spec:
6. [10]Status of Updates spec
7. [11]AOB
* [12]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 07 January 2010
<Steven> oops
<scribe> Scribe: Art
<Steven> How many people are joining?
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
<scribe> Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
Date: 7 January 2010
Review and tweak agenda
AB: the draft agenda was sent out yesterday (
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/00
53.html ). Any change requests?
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010JanMar/0053.html
[ no ]
Announcements
AB: WARP LC comment period ends Jan 13. Does anyone have any short
announcements?
[ no ]
Letter from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4
AB: On 29 December, Mohamed ZERGAOUI sent WebApps an letter (
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/15
00.html ) on behalf of ISO SC34/WG4. The letter notes some
similarities between our widget packaging spec and their Open
Packaging Conventions spec.
... I have not read the OPC spec; anyone read it?
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009OctDec/1500.html
MC: I read it
AB: anything you want to share about it?
MC: during our req gathering phase, we discussed similarities
... I have refs to the original emails
... this was mentioned by IBM (JonF)
... it was at least 2 years ago
... a conclusion was that ISO should start a ISO ZIP WG
... but don't know if that started or not
... I think ISO should create an ISO ZIP spec
... it would be good to get a real ZIP standard
... and not just some PKWare spec
AB: I recall those conversations with JonF on this subject
<timeless_mbp> Zakim: +??p12 is me
<scribe> ACTION: barstow respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009 email from
ISO SC34/WG4 [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-474 - Respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009
email from ISO SC34/WG4 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-01-14].
AB: after I respond, Marcos, perhaps you can respond too
MC: OK
AB: anything else on this topic for today?
[ no ]
Status of URI Scheme spec
SP: should this ISO be coordinated via HCG?
... external coord typically goes thru HCG
AB: good question
... I can forward it to HCG and seek comments
SP: yes, a heads-up to them would be good
<scribe> ACTION: barstow forward ISO packaging email to HCG
[recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-475 - Forward ISO packaging email to HCG
[on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-01-14].
AB: Robin, what is the status of the URI Scheme spec (
[17]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-uri/ )?
[17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-uri/
RB: Larry replied on the TAG list
... also got some feedback from Jonathan Rees
... we need to continue discussions
AB: so related discussions are happening on www-tag?
RB: yes
AB: we all have an action to contribute to the related discussion on
www-tag
... I haven't been following that list
... anything else on this spec for today?
RB: no; Larry's comments need to be discussed
Status of View Modes Media Features (VM-MF) spec:
AB: would one of the Editors of the VMMF spec please give a short
status of the spec ( [18]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ ).
[18] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/
MH: last month I commented on VF's related input
... I am in the process of reflecting those comments in the spec
... but only a local copy now
... I will have something to review in a week
... the VF proposal included some interfaces
... that will need to be addressed in the context of the VM-I spec
AB: any status on VM-I status to report?
MH: it needs to be developed in paralle with VM-MF spec
... should be ready for a CfC on FPWD of VM-I within a week or two
AB: an action to all to reveiew VM-I spec in the context of "is it
ready for FPWD" (
[19]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html )
[19] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html
MH: re, the VM-I spec, it resembles D3E spec
... I may move VM-I to ReSpec but D3E is probably too big to move
... I have been discussing this with Doug Schepers
AB: any other comments on the VM specs?
[ no ]
Status of Updates spec
AB: anything to report on the Updates spec (
[20]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/ ) Marcos?
[20] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/
<drogers> sorry I have a small comment
DR: re VM-MF or VM-I, doesn't have a Sec Consids sec
... will both have a Sec Consids section?
MH: VM-I does not have such a section yet
... it's still early and one can be added
DR: I'll look into what could be added
MH: It's OK with me if we add such a section to VM-I
MC: I expect to restart work on it next week
... hope to get it ready for a new pub by end of the month
AB: any other status for today before AOB?
[ none ]
AOB
AB: would like to take a quick look at the Widgets pub status page (
[21]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Widgets_Specificat
ions ) and update accordingly.
... I last updated the table a few weeks ago
... any updates needed?
[21] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/
PubStatus#Widgets_Specifications
[ none ]
AB: any other business for today?
... voice confs
... frequency going forward
... last call for discussion topics for today
<darobin> bye!
AB: meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: barstow forward ISO packaging email to HCG [recorded
in [22]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: barstow respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009 email from
ISO SC34/WG4 [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
