On 2011-10-20 16:23, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/20/11 1:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I disagree. It's extremely useful and natural for .find(":scope +
div") to match sibling of the context node.
I really don't think it is. If you want that, use document.find(":scope
+ div", context).
Basically, the presence of :scope would turn off *all* the limitations
That's a _really_ bizarre behavior. So in this case:
foo.find(":scope + div, div")
what all divs in the document would be found? Or is the "oh, ignore the
reference node except for matching :scope" meant to only apply on a
per-selector basis inside the selector list? That has its own issues,
especially with performance (e.g. merging nodesets while preserving DOM
order).
As it was specified in the old draft of queryScopedSelector (which is
the definition I start with if find/findAll get introduced), it was done
on a per selector basis, so the above would be equivalent to:
document.querySelector(":scope + div, :scope div", foo);
--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
