Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.05.09 11:37, Patrick Shirkey ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi,
After some discussion on the LAU lists over the past couple of years
it would appear their is a usability issue that is giving PA a bad
reputation as a pita.
I believe it boils down to this previously posted problem.
https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2008-November/002603.html
I would like to get some feedback on why exactly PA is not currently
able to autoreconfigure itself to play nicely with jack out of the
box.
Recent PA versions do just that. If you have a recent dbus'ified
version of JACK and PA 0.9.15 then PA will give up access to the
device when JACK asks for it and take it back afterwards. JACK is king
and PA obeys.
Thanks for your responses.
I will get hold of the git code for my testing.
Do you or anyone else have a specific reasoning for using only the
jackdbus version? Is is just because the person who wrote the code
wrote it to work with jackdbus?
Is this something that could be handled in a different way to give
legacy jack users this feature?
Cheers.
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
