On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Daniel Mack at 31/03/11 18:16 did gyre and gimble: >> Could you try to run multiple instances of the test binary at the same time? > > Yeah, I should be able to get around to this on Sunday... doubt I will > manage before then sadly. > > Does anyone else have any idea about the startup backtrace Daniel has... > this is obviously rather worrying... > > (just out of curiosity, I presume there is no chance you're accidentally > using your system PA's modules or similar wierdness? (especially > libpulsecommon.so which is unversioned - perhaps stracing will help > double check).
No, this is certainly not the reason. On OS X, there is no PulseAudio preinstalled of course, and on Linux, I called "libtool --mode exec gdb pulseaudio" to make sure the correct libs are used at runtime. Despite the fact that the daemon shouldn't crash regardless what the client throws at it, I wonder whether my example test is actually valid. Does it do anything bogus? Daniel _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
