#802: Status on Arch Linux | Splitting into Library and Application -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: Xavion | Owner: lennart Type: enhancement | Status: closed Milestone: | Component: build-system Resolution: distrospecific | Keywords: -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by coling): Lennart has already said that if the patch is clean he will likely apply it. That said, as a packager myself, I find it absolutely astounding that the Arch build system requires that you build and install a given source multiple times in order to package it. Every other distro I know of splits the PA package into separate binary packages, but they only need to build it once and the definition of which files go to which binary package is left up to the packager to specify, not the upstream project. To me, this requirement by the Arch build system is in no way indicative of a "relatively advanced" package management system - it's totally backwards :s A source tarball should be built once, and once only when creating binary packages. If you do just built it once then run the "make install-xxx" multiple times with different values of xxx, then this is slightly more sensible but pushing your Arch specific policy into upstream packages seems rather narrow minded anyway. I know, for example, that the library packaging policy is different in Mandriva than it is in RedHat and I know that Ubuntu do things differently still. This kind of split should definitely be left to the packaging system IMO. That's my €0.02 -- Ticket URL: <http://pulseaudio.org/ticket/802#comment:8> PulseAudio <http://pulseaudio.org/> The PulseAudio Sound Server _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-tickets mailing list pulseaudio-tickets@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-tickets