Hi again! From: Tommi Ilmonen > Hi. > > David Wennström kirjoitti: > > Yes, one of my objectives is to make it cheap and by using "normal" > webcams. The real task is done - I have built a 6DOF sensor and it works, > but (!) I want to make it faster. And these 80 ms are really nagging me. > > > Yes, it is a long time. BTW: If you do head tracking you can often get > away with 5DOF tracking, since you are probably only interested in the > two eyes.
Which DOF can I skip? The "roll" angle? > > I am also very interested in links and projects that I can read about 3D > > > > tracking system like this in general and particularly head tracking. > > > Here is link to one (that I wrote). I think most would be hidden in all > kinds of SW systems. > > http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/vr/2006/0224/00/0224toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/VR.2006.139 > Thank you, I'll look into it. > We used Apple iSight cameras which were certainly cheap enough (but you > cannot lock the white balance...) > > The unibrain board cameras would be very cheap, but then you are down to > 30 fps again... > It's not so much the fps but the latency from picture taken to getting it to the PC. Currently I will be stuck with the SPC900NC camera - trying to get it a little bit faster... :) > -- > ==================================================== > Tommi Ilmonen > Tel: +358-50-3841 543 > Ubiquitous Interaction Research Group > Helsinki Institute for Information Technology > http://www.hiit.fi/ubiquitousinteraction/ > ==================================================== > > Regards, --David _______________________________________________ pwc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc
