Thanks Je77...I will stick with 3.7 for now... -Mark
Jochen F. Rick wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I haven't tried it on 3.8. You could try setting up at 3.7 version and > then upgrading it to 3.8 through the regular update stream. Is there any > particular reason you need 3.8? Whenever I send out a major upgrade, I > try to make it work with the latest stable Squeak, but that isn't always > trivial. Squeak evolves in a way that isn't great at being backwards > compatible. The last time, it took me about 6 months to figure out some > of the incompatibilities (granted, that was for a new version of Comanche > as well). > > Peace and Luck! > > Je77 > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:35:34PM -0700, Mark Johnson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I tried following Je77's readme dated 2 December 2005. >> He obviously calls out the usage of Squeak 3.7... >> >> Is it possible to file-in Swiki.cs into Squeak 3.8? >> (After installing the pre-reqs via Squeak Map, of >> course...) >> >> I did not have any luck, but I didn't try too hard. I >> got a "MessageNotUnderstood ByteString>> fullName" >> error straight away. >> >> Sorry if I'm being a "Noob"...I had a lot of experience >> with VisualWorks about 8 years ago, but I haven't done >> anything "real" in Squeak before. >> >> Thanks, >> Mark > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Pws mailing list >> Pws@cc.gatech.edu >> https://mailman.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/pws > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pws mailing list Pws@cc.gatech.edu https://mailman.cc.gatech.edu/mailman/listinfo/pws
