On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz>wrote:
> Peter Finlayson wrote: > > Regardless, since there is code out in the wild that probably depends on >> this behaviour it is probably best to just note the quirk in the >> documentation. >> > > There's still a problem at the other end of the range, i.e. > no value that you can supply will match everything. There's > no workaround for that, so I think it should be regarded > as a bug. > > If breakage is a concern, maybe a new function should be > added and the old one deprecated. > > +1 to have *clean* functions claudio --
